McNeill v State

Appellant was a convicted sex offender on lifetime supervision. When Appellant had been on lifetime supervision for five years, the State Board of Parole Commissioners imposed additional conditions that were not enumerated


McNeill v. State – 132 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 54

3 comments for “McNeill v State

  1. Stephen Garrett
    August 8, 2016 at 6:11 pm

    Does anyone know if there is a class action suit yet as a result of this ruling? If so, who do I talk to to join?

    • Steve Kim
      August 8, 2016 at 8:10 pm

      From what I’ve heard, “those that know best” are trying to figure out what this means and what to do from here.
      Haven’t heard anything about a class action yet, but this decision just won a new trial for the individual because there were more P&P violations charged that were nowhere in the scope of what a violation is, in addition to the ‘legitimate’ violations he was charged with. He’ll probably still end up getting found guilty, but at least the decision prevents parole from adding anything else.

    • Chuck
      August 15, 2016 at 12:17 am

      Here is a link to one of the lawsuits amended complaints, filed in a federal district court, for you to read.

      There may be others and you should check with your own attorney if you have one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *